Platform

One assistant on the surface. A runtime underneath.

People do not want to choose a model, wire a chain, or babysit an agent. They want an outcome, and they want to know what happened. Cowind is built around exactly that: Wind decides what a request needs, does the parts it is allowed to do, and stops in front of anything that would be hard to take back.

The path of one request

Wind is working across 4 streams0/4
  • Financial analysisWind FinanceWaiting
  • Code architectureWind CodeWaiting
  • Market researchWind ResearchWaiting
  • Risk assessmentWind ReasoningWaiting
Reading from
  • GitHub
  • Stripe
  • Notion
  • Slack
Anything that leaves the workspace will stop here
  1. 01

    Intent and complexity

    A deterministic pass reads the attachments first, then the wording, in English and Turkish alike. An image routes to visual work no matter how the sentence is phrased. A greeting costs nothing: Wind answers it directly, with no specialist involved.

  2. 02

    A plan, not a chain

    Wind produces lanes with dependencies rather than a fixed pipeline. Independent lanes are allowed to run at the same time; dependent ones wait for what they actually need.

  3. 03

    Scoped retrieval

    Before answering, Wind searches the workspace knowledge the person in front of it is allowed to read — filtered by department and by the agent's own scopes, not by what happens to be in the same workspace.

  4. 04

    Parallel execution

    Up to 4 lanes run concurrently, each with its own fallback path. Every stream is visible while it runs — its name and its state, never its private reasoning.

  5. 05

    Synthesis

    Several passes come back as one answer in one voice. Contradictions are reconciled, or named as unresolved. Nothing in the output hints that the work was split up.

  6. 06

    Approval, then a receipt

    If the work implies sending, publishing, changing or deleting anything, Wind prepares the exact content and stops. A person approves, edits or rejects — and the decision is receipted either way.

Specialists

You never pick one. Wind does, per request, and often picks several at once.

  • Wind

    Conversation, routing, planning, and the final answer in one voice.

  • Wind Code

    Repositories, architecture, debugging, multi-file change, tests.

  • Wind Finance

    Statements, unit economics, runway, valuation, financial documents.

  • Wind Reasoning

    Long material, contradictions, trade-offs, root cause, risk.

  • Wind Research

    Markets, competitors, prior art, comparative evaluation.

  • Wind Vision

    Screenshots, diagrams, charts, scanned documents, UI.

  • Wind Data

    Extraction, structure, fast passes over long text.

Control

The limits are the product. Without them, nobody would leave this running.

Specialist calls per run
6
Orchestration depth
2
Parallel streams
4
Attempts per stream
3
Run timeout
180s
Rate limit
30/min

An agent is never wider than you

Every agent run intersects the agent's grants with the permissions of the person who started it. Narrower is allowed. Wider is not expressible.

No fabricated tool results

Wind is told which of the 770 services are actually connected. It cannot claim to have used one that is not.

Failure degrades, it does not break

Each lane walks an ordered fallback path. You see one calm line — Wind switched paths — while the cause goes to server telemetry.

Everything leaves a trail

Runs, retrievals, specialist passes, approvals and executions are recorded as operational events. Private reasoning is never recorded or shown.

Request access